(PS) Clavelle et al v. Children Family Services of Contra Costa and Solano County, No. 2:2014cv00927 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/29/15 recommending that this action be dismissed. F&R referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Clavelle et al v. Children Family Services of Contra Costa and Solano County Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 FRANSWAN & MALIKA CLAVELLE, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-927-MCE-EFB PS v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICES OF CONTRA COSTA & SOLANO COUNTY, 17 Defendants. 18 This action, in which plaintiffs are proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 19 20 undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 22, 21 2015, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the 22 complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiffs thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those 23 deficiencies, and warned plaintiffs that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 24 recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 4. The deadline has passed and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise 25 26 responded to the order. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 7 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 8 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 9 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: December 29, 2015. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.