(PS) CCF Ventures, LLC v. Sekhon, No. 2:2014cv00924 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/28/14: Plaintiff's motion for an order to remand 3 is granted. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's motion to shorten time 5 is denied as moot. (cc: Sacramento County Superior Court). (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) CCF Ventures, LLC v. Sekhon Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CCF VENTURES, LLC, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0924 JAM AC Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BUTA SEKHON, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Defendant, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action on April 15, 2014. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On May 2, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 2, 2014, are adopted in full; 27 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an order to remand, ECF No. 3, is granted; 28 3. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 matter jurisdiction; and 4. Plaintiff’s motion to shorten time, ECF No. 5, is denied as moot. DATED: May 28, 2014 4 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.