(PS) Kaur v. Gordon, No. 2:2014cv00812 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/23/2014 adopting 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
(PS) Kaur v. Gordon Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIRATH KAUR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0812 TLN AC PS v. ORDER DESMOND GORDON, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action on April 1, 2014. The 17 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On May 1, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 19 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.1 Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 1 27 28 Due to an oversight in the Clerk’s office, defendant was not served with these findings and recommendations at the time of their filing. See ECF No. 10. On May 20, 2014, however, service was accomplished. Defendant, thus, had 14 days from the date of service to file objections. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 1, 2014, are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court for lack of subject 4 matter jurisdiction. 5 Dated: June 23, 2014 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 /kaur0812.801 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.