(PC) McColm v. Trinity County, et al., No. 2:2014cv00773 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/6/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 20 motion for extension of time; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PATRICIA A. McCOLM, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-0773 KJM CKD (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND TRINITY COUNTY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff commenced this action in March 2014. On May 29, 2014, the undersigned 17 dismissed the complaint and granted thirty days’ leave to amend. On June 24, 2014, plaintiff was 18 granted a 90-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. On September 24, 2014, 19 plaintiff was granted a further extension of time, until December 23, 2014, to file an amended 20 complaint. That order notified plaintiff that “no further extensions of time will be granted.” The 21 docket indicates that plaintiff was served with the order. To date, plaintiff has not filed an 22 amended complaint; rather, she seeks yet another extension of time (ECF No. 20). 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 20) is denied. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 2 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 3 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 4 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 5 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: January 6, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 2/ mcco0773.fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.