(PS) Hall et al v. California Department of Social Services, et al, No. 2:2014cv00745 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2015 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PS) Hall et al v. California Department of Social Services, et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JAMA HALL, et al., 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-745-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFSOCIAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 17 18 This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the 19 undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 5, 2015, 20 the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the 21 complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those 22 deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a 23 recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 12. On June 1, 2015, plaintiff requested 24 an extension of time to file his amended complaint and/or a motion for reconsideration of the 25 May 5, 2015 order. That request was granted on June 18, 2015, ECF No. 15, and plaintiff’s 26 amended complaint was due thirty days later. 27 28 The deadline has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 110. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 6 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 7 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time 8 may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 9 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: July 27, 2015. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.