(PC) Wilson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., No. 2:2014cv00721 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/21/2014 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this case; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT L. WILSON, II, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-0721 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITAION, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 17 18 By order filed April 8, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to file a complaint and a completed 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so 20 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 21 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 1 1 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: May 21, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 wils0721.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.