(PC) Ento v. Sacramento County, No. 2:2014cv00681 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/19/14 ORDERING the clerk of the court randomly assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Ento v. Sacramento County Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN ENTO, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-0681 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 Recent court documents were served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the 18 postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 19 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More 20 than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and 21 plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make a random district judge assignment to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 28 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 2 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 3 days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 5 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: September 18, 2014 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.