(PS) Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division et al, No. 2:2013cv02420 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 15 Amended Motion to Dismiss. The amended complaint's race-based discrimination and hostile work environment causes of action are DISMISSED; and Defendant is DIRECTED to file an answer to the amended complaint's age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of ...nia Welfare Division et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBY BRADLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-2420 TLN DAD PS v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN ASSISTANCE OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WELFARE DIVISION, et al., 17 ORDER Defendants. 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 19 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 24 and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objection to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2015 (Dkt. No. 25) are adopted in full; 2. Defendant’s November 21, 2014 amended motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 15) is 4 5 6 7 8 9 granted; 3. The amended complaint’s race-based discrimination and hostile work environment causes of action are dismissed; and 4. Defendant is directed to file an answer to the amended complaint’s age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and 10 recommendations. 11 Dated: August 25, 2015 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
