(PC) Clark v. Herrera et al., No. 2:2013cv01885 - Document 41 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/05/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUINTERRIOUS CLARK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 No. 2:13-cv-1885 JAM DB P M. HERRERA, 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2017, plaintiff filed a request to dismiss this 19 action. (ECF No. 39.) In response, the court advised plaintiff that any future action on the 20 grounds raised in this case might be barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 40.) The court 21 gave plaintiff thirty days to withdraw his motion to dismiss. Plaintiff was informed that if he did 22 not do so, the court would recommend dismissal of this case without prejudice. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed a request to withdraw his motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the court should respect plaintiff’s wishes and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 1 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. The document should be captioned 3 “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 objections shall be filed and served within seven days after service of the objections. The parties 5 are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of the 6 right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 Dated: January 5, 2018 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/clar1885.dism fr 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
