(PC) MacGregor v. Dial et al, No. 2:2013cv01883 - Document 39 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/31/2014 ORDERING that the 22 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 14 request for a stay is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) MacGregor v. Dial et al Doc. 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN ANTHONY MACGREGOR, 12 No. 2:13-cv-1883 LKK AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 DR. DIAL, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2013, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s request for a stay (ECF No. 14) is denied. 4 DATED: March 31, 2014. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
