(PC) Richard K Johnson v. J Hilton, No. 2:2013cv01491 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/28/2014 ORDERING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; plaintiff's 12 Motion to Proceed IFP and 14 Motion to Proceed IFP are DENIED; plaintiff is required to pre-pay the full $400.00 filing fee before this action proceeds further; and failure to pay the full filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order shall result in dismissal of this action.(Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Richard K Johnson v. J Hilton Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD K. JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:13-cv-1491-MCE-CMK-P ORDER J. HILTON, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 19 District of California local rules. On January 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2014, are adopted in 2. Plaintiff’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 12 and 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 full; 14) are denied; and 3. Plaintiff is required to pre-pay the full $400.00 filing fee before this action proceeds further; and 4. The failure to pay the full filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order shall result in dismissal of this action. Dated: March 28, 2014 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.