(PS) Collier v. Vallejo Police Department et al, No. 2:2013cv00852 - Document 44 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/24/2014. Plaintiff's 10/7/2013 38 Motion to Set Aside Jurisdiction is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Collier v. Vallejo Police Department et al Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD T. COLLIER, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0852 LKK AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER VALLEJO POLICE DEP’T, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On February 11, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2014, are adopted in full; 27 2. Plaintiff’s October 7, 2013 motion to set aside jurisdiction (ECF No. 38) is denied . 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 DATED: March 24, 2014. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
