United States v. Anchordoguy, et al., No. 2:2013cv00848 - Document 44 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER granting 39 Motion to Enter Consent Decree signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/6/14: The Clerk of Court shall file the fully-executed Consent Decree, together with its three appendices ("App. A," "App. B.," and "App. C"), as a final judgment of this Court. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
United States v. Anchordoguy, et al. Doc. 44 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 14 15 16 17 18 No. 2:13-cv-848-MCE-CMK Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW R. ANCHORDOGUY, ANCHORDOGUY AND COMPANY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and JOHN R. BARLOW, Defendants. 19 20 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENTER CONSENT DECREE 21 Before the Court is an Unopposed Motion for Entry of Consent Decree. The 22 Court has fully considered the proposed Consent Decree and finds that it is fair, 23 24 reasonable, consistent with the Clean Water Act, and in the public interest. Further, no 25 comments from the public were received. The motion is therefore GRANTED and the 26 proposed Consent Decree is ENTERED. Simultaneous with the issuance of this Order, 27 the Court has signed page 18 of the Consent Decree, and the Clerk of Court shall file 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 the fully-executed Consent Decree, together with its three appendices (“App. A,” “App. 2 B.,” and “App. C”), as a final judgment of this Court. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2014

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.