(PC) Savage v. CDCR, et al., No. 2:2013cv00795 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/29/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOB SAVAGE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0795 JAM CKD P v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On June 2, 19 2015, plaintiff was granted an extension of time until August 10, 2015 to respond to defendants’ 20 motion. On August 21, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- 21 opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. In the same order, plaintiff was informed 22 that failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition would result in a recommendation 23 that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day period has now 24 expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. His last filing in this action was on 25 May 28, 2015. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 26 27 dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 28 //// 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: September 29, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 2 / sava0795.46fr 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.