(PC) Lucas v. Arthur et al, No. 2:2013cv00317 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/1/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Lucas v. Arthur et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISIAH LUCAS, JR., 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-00317 JAM JFM (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS C. ARTHUR, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By order filed August 14, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff 19 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 21 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 22 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 23 the party is fully effective. 24 25 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 28 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 2 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 3 waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 4 1991). 5 DATED: November 1, 2013 6 7 8 9 luca0317.fta.nca 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
