(PC) Savoy v. Schlachter, No. 2:2013cv00014 - Document 38 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/25/2013. Defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for More Definite Statement is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Savoy v. Schlachter Doc. 38 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERWIN SAVOY, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0014 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STAN SCHLACHTER, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 19, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2013, are adopted in full; 28 2. The defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 (ECF No. 19) is denied. 2 3 4 DATED: November 25, 2013 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
