(PC) Washington v. Essex, et al, No. 2:2012cv03054 - Document 113 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/30/2018 ADOPTING 105 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Washington v. Essex, et al Doc. 113 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 5 No. 2:12-cv-3054 JAM DB P Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 C. ESSEX, et al., 8 ORDER Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 11 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 12 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 13 14 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 15 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 105.) Neither 16 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 17 18 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 19 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2018 (ECF No. 105), are adopted in 20 21 22 full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 100) is denied. 23 24 25 26 DATED: May 30, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
