(PC) Brown v. State of California, et al, No. 2:2012cv03045 - Document 33 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/29/2014 VACATING the 5/14/2014 findings and recommendations 30 ; plaintiff's 32 objections to the findings and recommendations are DISREGARDED as moot; and the Court will screen plaintiff's fourth amended complaint in due course.(Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Brown v. State of California, et al Doc. 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEXTER BROWN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-03045-MCE-AC-P v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights 17 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 14, 2014 this court issued Findings and 19 Recommendations that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to 20 file a fourth amended complaint by March 23, 2014 as he was previously ordered to do. See ECF 21 Nos. 28, 30. Plaintiff has now complied with the previous court order and has filed a fourth 22 amended complaint. ECF No. 31. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The Findings and Recommendations entered on May 14, 2014 are vacated; 25 2. Plaintiff’s objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 32) are 26 disregarded as moot; and, 27 //// 28 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3. The court will screen plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint in due course. DATED: May 29, 2014 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
