(PS) Haas Bros LLC v. Eht Lozaro, et al, No. 2:2012cv03003 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/18/13. This action is summarily remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; and this case is CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PS) Haas Bros LLC v. Eht Lozaro, et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAAS BROS LLC, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 2:12-cv-3003 JAM DAD PS vs. EHT LOZARO; YOLANDA LOZARO, ORDER 14 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 Defendants are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On December 18, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on defendants and which contained notice that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 22 and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and defendants have not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 18, 2012 (Doc. No. 4) are 3 adopted in full; 4 5 6 7 2. This action is summarily remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; and 3. This case is closed. DATED: March 18, 2013 8 /s/ John A. Mendez 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.