(PC) Calhoun v. Gomez et al, No. 2:2012cv02856 - Document 71 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/4/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 69 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING AS MOOT AND UNTIMELY 62 Motion for Extension of Time. (Meuleman, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMONT L. CALHOUN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2856-GEB-EFB P v. ORDER M. GOMEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 6, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 26 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 6, 2015, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 62) be denied as both moot and 4 untimely. 5 Dated: March 4, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
