(PS) Robinson v. San Joaquin County et al, No. 2:2012cv02783 - Document 24 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/5/2013 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING, in part, 9 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING, with prejudice, Defendant Solis; DISMISSING all state law claims; ORDERING Defendant San Joaquin County to file an answer to the Title VII claim within 28 days. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
(PS) Robinson v. San Joaquin County et al Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY W. ROBINSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS v. ORDER COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On May 30, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 17 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 20 21 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 22 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 23 1983). 24 25 26 27 28 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed May 30, 2013, are ADOPTED and 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss, filed April 3, 2012, (dkt. no. 9), is granted in part; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. Defendant Solis is dismissed with prejudice from this action; 2 3. All state law claims are dismissed; and 3 4. Defendant County is ordered to file an answer to the Title VII claim within twenty- 4 eight days of this order. 5 Date: August 05, 2013 6 _____________________________________ 7 8 9 ___________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.