(PC) Vasquez v. State of California et al, No. 2:2012cv02562 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/03/12 ORDERING the clerk of the court assign a District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Vasquez v. State of California et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT VASQUEZ, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-2562 CKD P vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 14 ORDER & Defendants. 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By an order filed October 17, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed 17 application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do 18 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has 19 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court assign a district judge to this action. 22 23 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 3 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 4 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 5 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 Dated: December 3, 2012 7 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 2 vasq2562.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
