Malibu Media, LLC v. Unknown, No. 2:2012cv02481 - Document 30 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/11/12 adopting 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Does 2-59 are dismissed without prejudice.(Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Malibu Media, LLC v. Unknown Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, a California corporation, 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. 2:12-cv-2481 JAM DAD vs. 14 JOHN DOES 1 through 59, 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER / 17 In this action plaintiff filed an ex parte application for expedited discovery to 18 serve Rule 45 subpoenas on Internet Service Providers to obtain identifying information 19 applicable for the Doe defendants. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). 21 On October 11, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings 24 and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no objections have been filed 25 by any party. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 11, 2012, (Doc. No. 29) are 5 6 7 adopted in full; and 2. Does 2-59 are dismissed without prejudice. DATED: December 11, 2012 8 /s/ John A. Mendez 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
