(PC) Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al.,, No. 2:2012cv02440 - Document 285 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/28/2015 ORDERING that the 252 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 195 , 196 , 198 , 200 , 211 , 212 , 213 , 214 , 218 , 226 , 227 requests for preliminary injunctive relief are DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
(PC) Manning, et al., v. CDCR, et al., Doc. 285 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHERMAN D. MANNING, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:12-cv-2440 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. BUNNELL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 15, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 252. Plaintiff 23 has filed several documents that are not identified as objections to the findings and 24 recommendations, but that could be considered objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 See ECF Nos. 256, 260, 261, 263, 268. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 27 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 28 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 analysis. 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2015 (ECF No. 252), are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s requests for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 195, 196, 198, 200, 211, 212, 213, 214, 218, 226, 227) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 28, 2015 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.