(PC) Cofield v. Swarthout et al, No. 2:2012cv02343 - Document 36 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/2014 ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Cofield v. Swarthout et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCENT E. COFIELD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2343-MCE-EFB P v. ORDER G. SWARTHOUT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 13, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2014, are adopted in full; and 27 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 2. Defendant Valencia’s February 21, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is denied. Dated: June 25, 2014 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
