(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento Police Department, No. 2:2012cv02322 - Document 8 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/24/13 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Weaver v. Sacramento Police Department Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE WEAVER, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-2322 MCE CKD P vs. SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPT., Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed March 1, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 17 affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do 18 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has 19 now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma 20 pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 25 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 26 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 2 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 3 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: April 24, 2013 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 8 weav2322.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
