(PS) United States v. Laughlin et al, No. 2:2012cv01990 - Document 39 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/5/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/4/13 36 are ADOPTED and The government's MOTION to STRIKE and to dismiss second counterclaim, filed 5/13/13 29 , is GRANTED in part; Defendants' counter-claim, filed 4/22/13 28 , is STRIKEN and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the default of defendants Robert Laughlin and Barbra Laughlin. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
(PS) United States v. Laughlin et al Doc. 39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 No. 2:12-cv-1990 MCE GGH PS v. ORDER ROBERT S. LAUGHLIN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On October 4, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 19 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 21 22 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 26 27 28 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed October 4, 2013 (ECF No. 36), are ADOPTED and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The government’s motion to strike and to dismiss second counterclaim, filed May 13, 2013, (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED in part; 3 2. Defendants’ counter-claim, filed April 22, 2013 (ECF No. 28), is stricken and the 4 Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the default of defendants Robert Laughlin and Barbra 5 Laughlin. 6 Dated: November 5, 2013 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.