(PS) Blackshire v. Sacramento Regional Transit, No. 2:2012cv01803 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2015. Plaintiff's 5/26/2015 17 Motion to Reopen Case is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Blackshire v. Sacramento Regional Transit Doc. 22 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 PATRICK BLACKSHIRE, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 v. No. 2:12-cv-1803 JAM GGH PS ORDER SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 5, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 15 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 16 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 19) Plaintiff has 17 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 18 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 19 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that: 21 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 5, 2015, are adopted in full; and 22 2. Plaintiff’s May 26, 2016 motion to reopen his case (ECF No. 17) is denied. 23 DATED: October 15, 2015 24 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
