Overton v. Assets of Michael L. Overton, No. 2:2012cv01574 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/2/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
Overton v. Assets of Michael L. Overton Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL LOUIS OVERTON, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-1574 JAM JFM P vs. 13 ASSETS OF MICHALE L. OVERTON, 14 Defendant. 15 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed June 26, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 17 affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do 18 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has 19 now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has neither filed an in forma 20 pauperis affidavit nor paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: August 2, 2012. 5 6 7 8 9 12 over1574.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.