(PC) Weaver v. Davisson, No. 2:2012cv01091 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/30/2012, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Weaver v. Davisson Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIE WEAVER, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-1091 WBS DAD P vs. ATTORNEY HILARY DAVISSON, Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By an order filed June 1, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 17 affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to 18 do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff was also granted 19 the same period of time in which to voluntarily dismiss this action. The thirty day period has 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order and has not filed an 21 in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: July 30, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 11 weav1391.fifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
