(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan, et al, No. 2:2012cv00556 - Document 225 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/26/2018 ADOPTING 217 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 206 , 210 , 213 , 215 motions for injunctive relief are DENIED. This case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan, et al Doc. 225 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:12-cv-0556 KJM DB P ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 21, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 20 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 217.) Plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 21, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 206, 210, 213, 215) are denied; and 4 3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 5 proceedings. 6 DATED: June 26, 2018. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2