(PC) Williams v. Young et al, No. 2:2012cv00318 - Document 45 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 44 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/15 and ORDERING that defendants' 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Benson, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Williams v. Young et al Doc. 45 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 CURTIS J. WILLIAMS, 7 8 9 No. 2:12-cv-0318 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C/O T. YOUNG, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 14 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On July 31, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 16 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 17 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 20 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2015, are adopted in full; and 23 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34) is denied. 24 DATED: October 15, 2015 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
