(HC) Bucci v. Busby, No. 2:2011cv03147 - Document 31 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/30/2014 ADOPTING 30 Findings and Recommendations in Full. The 27 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Claims 3, 5, 6, and 8 on the grounds that they are barred by the statute of limitations on procedurally barred; respondent's motion to dismiss claim 7 is denied without prejudice. Petitioner shall file a second amended petition raising claims 1, 2 and 4 only within 30 days from the date of this order. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICOLA CHRISTOPHER BUCCI, 12 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-3147-GEB-KJN-P Petitioner, v. ORDER TIMOTHY E. BUSBY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 27, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2014, are adopted in full; and 28 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27) is granted as to claims 3, 5, 6, and 8 on 1 1 grounds that they are barred by the statute of limitations and procedurally barred; respondent’s 2 motion to dismiss claim 7 is denied without prejudice; and petitioner shall file a second amended 3 petition raising claims 1, 2, and 4 only within thirty days from the date of this order. 4 Dated: October 30, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.