(PC) Florence v. Nangalama et al, No. 2:2011cv03119 - Document 61 (E.D. Cal. 2014)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/30/2014 ADOPTING 59 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 58 Motion for injunctive relief without prejudice. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DAVID FLORENCE, 7 8 9 No. 2:11-cv-3119 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A.W. NANGALAMA, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 14 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 15 On September 19, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 16 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 17 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 18 objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 20 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 22 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2014, are adopted in full; and 23 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 58) is denied without prejudice. 24 Dated: October 30, 2014 25 26 27 28 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
