(HC) Johnson v. Swarthout, No. 2:2011cv02719 - Document 55 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/13/12 recommending that this action be dismissed for petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(HC) Johnson v. Swarthout Doc. 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL SAMUEL JOHNSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-2719 GEB CKD P vs. GARY SWARTHOUT, 14 Respondent. 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by 17 the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which 18 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for 20 petitioner’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 21 110. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 2 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: August 13, 2012 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 1 john2719.133a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
