-DAD (PS) Residential Investments LLC v. Aranda et al, No. 2:2011cv02633 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/10/2011 ORDERING that the 3 findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2011 are adopted in full. This action is summarily REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Yolo. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED.(Duong, D)

Download PDF
-DAD (PS) Residential Investments LLC v. Aranda et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENTS LLC, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-2633 JAM DAD PS vs. ANTONIO ARANDA, et al., 14 ORDER Defendants. 15 / 16 Defendants Antonio Aranda, Imelda Aranda and Heriberto Ponce filed a Notice of 17 Removal on October 6, 2011, and are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled unlawful detainer 18 action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(21). 20 On October 7, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after 23 service of the findings and recommendations. Defendants have filed objections to the findings 24 and recommendations. 25 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to be supported by the 2 record and by proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2011 (Doc. No. 3) are 5 adopted in full; 6 7 8 9 2. This action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Yolo; and 3. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. DATED: November 10, 2011 10 /s/ John A. Mendez 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.