(PC) Robinson v. Cate et al, No. 2:2011cv02555 - Document 92 (E.D. Cal. 2016)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/17/16: The Findings and Recommendations 91 are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 90 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Robinson v. Cate et al Doc. 92 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE JAMAL ROBINSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-2555 MCE AC P v. ORDER MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 14, 2016, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the Findings 22 and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 91. No party has filed 23 objections to the Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 14, 2016 (ECF No. 91) are ADOPTED IN FULL. 3 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 90) is DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: February 17, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
