(PS) Alston v. Tassone, et al, No. 2:2011cv02078 - Document 35 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/27/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 33 are ADOPTED IN FULL; Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave of Court 32 , construed as a Request to Stay the Action is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Alston v. Tassone, et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CD ALSTON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-2078 JAM GGH PS vs. PAUL TASSONE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On July 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 20 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 21 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 22 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED that: 25 \\\\\ 26 \\\\\ Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations (dkt. no. 33) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2 2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave of court (dkt. no. 32), construed as a request to stay 3 the action, is DENIED. 4 DATED: July 27, 2012 5 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
