(PS) Alston v. Tassone, et al, No. 2:2011cv02078 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/15/2011 ORDERING The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to ADOPT 10 the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion 9 for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
(PS) Alston v. Tassone, et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CD ALSTON 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-11-2078 JAM GGH PS vs. PAUL TASSONE, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 __________________________________/ 16 ORDER On November 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Objections were filed 19 on November 29, 2011, and they were considered by the district judge. 20 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to 21 which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. 22 Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 23 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, 24 the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1983). 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 3 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary 5 injunction (dkt. no. 9) is denied. 6 DATED: December 15, 2011 7 8 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2