-DAD (TEMP)(PS) JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sweeney, No. 2:2011cv01524 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/7/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 6 are ADOPTED in full; The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case; REMANDING CASE to Placer County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-DAD (TEMP)(PS) JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sweeney Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-01524-MCE-DAD (TEMP) PS vs. ORDER HOWARD SWEENEY, 15 Defendant. 16 / 17 Defendant, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. 18 The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72- 19 302(c)(21). 20 On June 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on defendant and which contained notice to defendant that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 15, 2011 (ECF No. 6) are ADOPTED in full; 2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Placer; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Dated: July 7, 2011 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
