-DAD (HC) Galloway v. Cates et al, No. 2:2011cv01464 - Document 23 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/12 ADOPTING in full 19 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 11 Motion to Dismiss; and WITHDRAWING 14 Motion to Amend the Complaint. Petitioner is GRANTED 30 days leave to file a declaration notifying the court as to how he wishes to proceed in this case. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
-DAD (HC) Galloway v. Cates et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER LYNN GALLOWAY, Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-11-1464 KJM DAD P R.H. TRIMBLE, Warden, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 17 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On November 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to 2 be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 8, 2011, are adopted in 5 full; 6 2. Respondent’s July 22, 2011 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 11) is denied; 7 3. Petitioner’s motion to amend (Doc. No. 14) is deemed withdrawn; and 8 4. Petitioner is granted thirty days leave to file a declaration notifying the court 9 10 as to how he wishes to proceed in this case. DATED: January 23, 2012. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 /gall1464.801hc 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.