(PC) Quinn v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Staff et al, No. 2:2011cv01387 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/12 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiffs failure to comply with the Local Rules and with the courts orders. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Quinn v. Sacramento County Main Jail Medical Staff et al Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN QUINN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2: 11-cv-1387 MCE DAD P vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, 14 Defendant. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed July 12, 2012, plaintiff’s first amended complaint was dismissed 17 and he was granted thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint. The thirty day period 18 has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 19 court’s order. 20 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the court’s July 12, 2012 21 order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable, plaintiff was properly served at 22 his address of record. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 23 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 24 the party is fully effective. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed 2 without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Local Rules and with the court’s 3 orders. See Local Rule 110; FED . R. CIV . P. 41(b). 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 5 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen 6 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 7 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 8 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 9 specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 10 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 DATED: October 26, 2012. 12 13 14 15 16 DAD:dpw quin1387.fta.nca 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
