-GGH (PS) Williams v. Technique Towing/Advanced Automotive/GB7 et al, No. 2:2011cv01346 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/26/12 RECOMMENDING that the 3 Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
-GGH (PS) Williams v. Technique Towing/Advanced Automotive/GB7 et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOYCE WILLIAMS, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-1346 MCE GGH PS vs. TECHNIQUE TOWING/ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE/GB7, et al., 14 15 16 17 Defendants FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed July 12, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight 18 days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff 19 of the deficiencies in her complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff 20 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the 22 reasons given in the July 12, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 23 dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 3 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 4 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: January 26, 2012 6 7 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GGH:035 W illiams1346.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.