-EFB (PS) Hedgcoth v. Elwer et al, No. 2:2011cv01328 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER adopting 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/28/11: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee of $350.00. (Kaminski, H)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PS) Hedgcoth v. Elwer et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JOSEPH HEDGCOTH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-11-1328 JAM EFB PS vs. 13 KEN ELWER, et al., 14 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 15 16 On July 5, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 20 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 21 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 22 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed July 5, 2011, are 23 ADOPTED; 24 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED; 25 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days in which to pay the filing fee of $350.00; and 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to pay the required filing fee will result in a 2 recommendation by the assigned magistrate judge that this action be dismissed. 3 DATED: September 28, 2011 4 5 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
