(PC) Mitchell v. Cate et al, No. 2:2011cv01240 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2011 ORDERING that the 13 findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full. For the reasons set forth in the 9 Order, filed on September 14, 2011, defendants Cate, Kernan, Chapman, Harkness and Dangler are dismissed from this action.(Duong, D)
Download PDF
(PC) Mitchell v. Cate et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY MITCHELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P vs. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. For the reasons set forth in the Order, filed on September 14, 2011 (docket # 4 9), defendants Cate, Kernan, Chapman, Harkness and Dangler are dismissed from this action. 5 DATED: December 8, 2011 6 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2