(PS) CitiMortgage Inc. v. McCampbell, No. 2:2011cv01200 - Document 11 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations 8 are adopted in full; 2. The action is remanded to the Placer County Superior Court; 3. The Clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the Placer County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (MCV 45346) in the proof of service; and 4. The Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE REMANDED to Placer County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PS) CitiMortgage Inc. v. McCampbell Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CITIMORTGAGE INC., Plaintiff, 10 11 CIV. NO. S-11-1200 KJM GGH PS vs. 12 GARY ROBERT MCCAMPBELL, 13 ORDER 14 15 16 Defendant. / On November 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 20 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to 23 be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The findings and recommendations (dkt. no. 8) are adopted in full; 26 2. The action is remanded to the Placer County Superior Court; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. The Clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the 2 Placer County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (MCV 45346) in the proof of 3 service; and 4 5 4. The Clerk is directed to close this case. DATED: March 7, 2012. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 McCampbell.1200.jo.wpd 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.