(PC) Morris v. Bradford et al, No. 2:2011cv01171 - Document 99 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/23/18; the stay is LIFTED; within 30 days, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; defendants shall file any reply per Local Rule 230(1). (Benson, A.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Morris v. Bradford et al Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON E. MORRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-1171-TLN-DB P v. ORDER A.J. R. BRADFORD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 18, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2018 (ECF No. 98) are ADOPTED 27 28 in full; 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. The stay of these proceedings is lifted; and 2 3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file his opposition to 3 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed January 14, 2016 (ECF No. 70). Defendants 4 shall file any reply in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). 5 6 Dated: August 23, 2018 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
