-KJN (PC) Davis v. Carlton et al, No. 2:2011cv01100 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/25/11 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
-KJN (PC) Davis v. Carlton et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL S. DAVIS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-1100 KJN P vs. C. CARLTON, et al., 14 ORDER and Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner seeking in forma pauperis status in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 23, 2011, this court issued an order 18 directing plaintiff to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis, on a form used in non- 19 prisoner cases, which was attached to the court’s order. (Dkt. No. 5.) That order was served on 20 plaintiff’s address of record but returned by the postal service as “undeliverable.” It appears that 21 plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in 22 propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than thirty have passed since the 23 attempted service of the court’s order, and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current 24 address. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to this action. 3 4 Additionally, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 6 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 7 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 8 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 9 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 10 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 11 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 12 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 DATED: July 25, 2011 14 15 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 davi1100.33a 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.