(PC) Armstead v. Virga et al, No. 2:2011cv01054 - Document 37 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/20/2012 VACATING 34 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, 35 Judgment; GRANTING 33 Motion for Extension of Time. Objections to 32 Findings and Recommendations due within 30 days. (Michel, G)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Armstead v. Virga et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ARMSTEAD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2: 11-cv-1054 JAM KJN P vs. TIM V. VIRGA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On February 23, 2012, the undersigned adopted the January 20, 2012 findings and 17 recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed. On February 13, 2012, plaintiff 18 filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. 19 The undersigned was not aware of plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time when he issued the 20 February 23, 2012 order. 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. The February 23, 2012 order (Dkt. No. 34) and judgment (Dkt. No. 35) are 23 vacated; 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 33) is granted; 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file objections to 2 the January 20, 2012 findings and recommendations. 3 DATED: 4 March 20, 2012 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
