(PC) Crane v. McDonald et al, No. 2:2011cv00663 - Document 62 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/25/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 61 motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has 30 days to file and serve objections to the findings and recommendations, no further extensions will be granted; and plaintiff may file a motion to compel discovery no later than 4/22/2013. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Crane v. McDonald et al Doc. 62 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-0663 KJM CKD P vs. 13 MIKE McDONALD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff has requested a second extension of time to file objections to the 17 February 6, 2013 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, the court will grant this 18 request. However, plaintiff is cautioned that arguments and/or evidence on matters other than 19 plaintiff’s alleged denial of outdoor exercise will be disregarded. 20 Plaintiff also seeks to modify the December 3, 2012 scheduling order to grant 21 him until April 22, 2013 to file a motion to compel discovery. Good cause appearing, the court 22 will so modify the order. However, the period in which to serve discovery requests has closed 23 and will not be reopened. (See Dkt. No. 59.) 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 61) is granted; 26 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and Dockets.Justia.com 1 serve objections to the findings and recommendations. No further extensions will be granted; 2 and 3 4 3. Plaintiff may file a motion to compel discovery no later than April 22, 2013. Dated: March 25, 2013 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 2/kly cran0663.36 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.